Advertisement
Suzuki Carry vs Mazda Scrum: Which Kei Truck Should You Buy?
A direct spec comparison between the Suzuki Carry (DB51T, 1991-1998) and the Mazda Scrum (DB51T, 1991-1998).
Verdict by Category
| Suzuki Carry | Mazda Scrum | Winner | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 45hp | 45hp | Tie |
| Payload | 770 lbs | 770 lbs | Tie |
| Lower typical price | 4200,8000 | 4000,7500 | Mazda Scrum |
Full Spec Comparison
| Spec | Suzuki Carry | Mazda Scrum |
|---|---|---|
| Make | Suzuki | Mazda |
| Model | Carry | Scrum |
| Generation | DB51T | DB51T |
| Years | 1991-1998 | 1991-1998 |
| Engine | 660 cc | 660 cc |
| Horsepower | 45 hp | 45 hp |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | 5MT | 5MT |
| Payload | 770 lbs | 770 lbs |
| Bed length | 77 in | 77 in |
| Price range | $4,200–$8,000 | $4,000–$7,500 |
| Best for | Best all-round value | Suzuki Carry equivalent at a lower price |
Suzuki Carry: Pros & Cons
Pros
- Largest bed dimensions in this comparison group
- Very strong parts and aftermarket support in the US
- Widely regarded as the easiest model to find at auction
Cons
- Ride quality is firmer than Sambar
- Base trims lack power steering
- Interior trim wears faster than Honda equivalents
Mazda Scrum: Pros & Cons
Pros
- Mechanically identical to the Suzuki Carry of the same era (badge-engineered)
- Often priced lower than equivalent Carry due to lower brand recognition
- Same strong parts compatibility as Carry
Cons
- Some parts listings only reference 'Suzuki Carry,' requiring cross-referencing
- Resale value typically lower than Carry-branded trucks
- Badge and trim parts specific to Mazda are harder to source
Advertisement